Customer reviews for PUMA Faas 100 TR Women's Trail Running Shoes

PUMA Faas 100 TR Women's Trail Running Shoes

Built for the trail runner who's looking to feel light, fast, and the earth beneath her feet. With the least amount of cushioning in the Faas running range, the Faas 100 TR is built more as a racing shoe than an everyday trail running shoe. Case in point? Its 0mm heel to toe drop intended to help strengthen a runner's feet and lower extremities over time. But its earthCELL traction and durable, protective upper means it can stand up to whatever the great outdoors decides to dish out. 30 DAY TEST RUN: Go ahead. Get them dirty. Put them through their paces. If you aren’t 100% satisfied, you can return these shoes within 30 days of purchase using our normal returns process. Features: Lightweight, protective single layer mesh upper for breathability and protection Welded toe for optimum protection on the trails earthCELL designation for multi-directional lugs, enhanced traction, and durable upper materials that provide protection no matter what the terrain or weather Toggle bungee lace for a snug, secure fit Bootie construction with gusseted tongue for a secure fit and to reduce debris Internal suede midfoot EverFit structure for lightweight stability Molded high-rebound EcoOrthoLite® sockliner for breathability, comfort, and fit Lightweight FaasFoam+ one-piece midsole (PUMA's new proprietary blend of foam and rubber) for improved resilience and increased step-in comfort Enhanced flexibility at outsole for a smooth toe-off EverTrack high abrasion resistant rubber featured in high wear areas for added durability Multi-directional lugs for traction in all types of terrain Heel pull tab for easy on/off PUMA Formstrip at medial and lateral sides PUMA Cat Logo at tongue and woven PUMA Cat Logo label at lateral side Heel to toe drop: 0mm
Overall rating:
3.333 / 5
3.3
 / 
5
(3 reviews) 3
Open Ratings Snapshot
Rating breakdown 3 reviews
5 Stars
1
4 Stars
0
3 Stars
1
2 Stars
1
1 Star
0
2 out of 367%reviewers recommend this product.
Customer reviews for Faas 100 TR Women's Trail Running Shoes
Review 1 for Faas 100 TR Women's Trail Running Shoes
Size: 
Small
Too small
Small
Very large
Width: 
Narrow
Too narrow
Narrow
Too wide
Comfort: 
Pretty good
Just okay
Pretty good
Love it!
Overall rating 
3 / 5
3 / 5

Run to narrow for me.

PostedApril 7, 2014
Customer avatar
Moni50
,Jersey City, NJ
Age:45 to 54
Gender:Female
Length of ownership:1 week
Usage frequency:Weekly
Yes/No:Yes
Used for:Walking
Level:Expert Walker. I don’t run.
Miles ran per week:0-15
I had to send my pair back. These sneakers where to narrow for me. They are good looking shoes, but I guess, just not for my shaped foot.
Don't know did not wear them.
Yes, I recommend this product.
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
Review 2 for Faas 100 TR Women's Trail Running Shoes
Overall rating 
5 / 5
5 / 5

Great shoe for those who want the barefoot running experience without the pain on your feet!

PostedFebruary 8, 2014
Customer avatar
Lisa1234
These shoes provide a hefty sole (for minimal running shoes) that are optimal for those who run on the dirt. The 0mm foot drop meets requirements for the "barefoot" running experience, with the sole preventing pain from rocks and other "bumps" in the path.
minimal shoe trail runners
ProsValue for money, Quality
Yes, I recommend this product.
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
Review 3 for Faas 100 TR Women's Trail Running Shoes
Size: 
Small
Too small
Small
Very large
Comfort: 
Just okay
Just okay
Just okay
Love it!
Overall rating 
2 / 5
2 / 5

Great Looking Shoe With Serious Design Flaws

PostedDecember 16, 2013
Customer avatar
Ellen78
,New York, NY, USA
Length of ownership:1 week
Yes/No:Yes
Perfect shoe in theory, but I found the fit, quality and price to be a complete disappointment even though I got it half off. I wear a size 8.5W but ordered an 8.5 and 9 in black and an 8.5 in blue.
Out of the box I fell in love with the 0 drop, the gorgeous pink and black contrast, the super light weight, the breathability and everything else about the design of the shoe, but the love was short-lived. It's a slip-on with a one-piece collar and tongue, exactly like a water shoe. The collar opening is very small, mainly because the tongue is too long or cut too shallow and has a painful reinforced seam at top that made the shoe impossible to wear for long, and the opening has virtually no stretch. Adjusting the laces and using the back tab didn't help, I couldn't get either 8.5 on with a medium sock and struggled to get the 9 black on my bare feet using a shoehorn and the back tab. Once I got it on, the tongue cut painfully into my front ankle, I'm 5'1" and 120lbs, even my BF could see how far dug in it was. Sitting with my foot pointed to alleviate pressure did not help, the tongue's reinforced seam at the shoe opening was still sharp and painful. It was worse with a flexed foot so walking and doing a test jog hurt, a lot. My insole was also in pain though the shoe waist was perfect size even for my width. Once I took the shoes off I realized the tongue had stopped circulation to my foot!
The 9 left a lot of room in the toe so I'd say the shoe ran true-to-size. The tongue needs to be cut and curved at the ankle and the seam much more flexible and soft. The collar opening needs width and stretch, seriously. Also the stitching connecting the reinforced rubber strip at the forefoot looked a bit flimsy and the formstrip slightly puckered over the mesh, like it would disintegrate quickly. The blue was less iridescent than the picture and more standard grey-blue. I liked the blue color well enough, the fit was the same as the black.
The black shoe looks absolutely amazing, chic and trendy and could be worn anywhere. The width and length, beyond the other issues, were perfect. The fit was a bit tight, but not uncomfortable. The toebox was roomy and the shoe looked great on my foot so I'm very disappointed. I seriously wanted to love it but can't recommend the current design. If even just the fit issues I had were fixed, I would gladly re-buy at full price.
ConsExpensive, style/design, quality, price
No, I do not recommend this product.
+2points
2of 2voted this as helpful.